![]() |
|
Bloopers & Blunders: Objective of Diversification Quotation Commenting on Gillettes announcement to buy
Duracell, consider the following quotation: Answer Suppose youre the shareholder of Gillette and you would like to diversify into, say, a company that has cash flows similar to Duracell. What would you do? How much would it cost you? Now compare that cost with the premium over market price that a company has to pay the acquiring firm. Thus, as a shareholder of Gillette you get the same diversification effect whether you own the shares of Duracell or the company itself, other things being equal. However, under the first scenario the cost of diversification is brokerage commission, which is approximately 1% of the price of the stock, compared with a 20% premium for Duracell (see Financing section of the acquisition story). In fact, the latter options cost is higher once you include an additional 1.5% in fees that you have to pay your investment bank for their services in structuring the deal. Therefore, diversification, for the pure sake of diversification, does not make any sense. I am not saying that this deal does not make sense. I am saying that the diversification argument is not sufficient reason for a merger.
By Alex Tajirian |
|||
[ Home of +Value | Bookstore | Instructors Corner | Finance Channel | About Us ]