"Newbies"

Humor

Themes & Topics

Glossary

Lecture Notes

Trivia & Factoids

 

Bubbles in History: Is There Something To Be Learned?

Issue

Is the stock market currently a bubble waiting to burst? Professor Kindelberger, a retired professor of economic history at MIT, thinks so.

A new edition of his classic study, "Manias, Panics and Crashes" (John Wiley & Sons, 250 pages, $19.95) is out. The following are excerpts from a review by Thomas Mulligan of the LA Times.

Previous major bubbles include the South Sea fiasco of 1720 in which a British company's Latin American trade franchise sparked a frenzy for its shares; the 17th century "tulip mania" in Holland, where even garden-variety tulip bulbs became objects of frantic speculation; and the U.S. stock market in 1929 and 1987.

 

Any Lessons?

Anecdotes
Let’s start with an anecdotal story. According to the Times, Sir Isaac Newton, the supreme rationalist regarded as one of history's leading geniuses, saw the South Sea Bubble for what it was and sold his stake early at a heartwarming profit of 7,000 pounds, but then plunged back in, losing a fortune of 20,000 pounds when the bubble burst.

 

"Fads"
According to Professor Kindelberger, the public becomes fixated on "fads." One such fad as described in the book was when in the high-inflation 1970s, ‘it used to be that every Friday afternoon, people would see what happened to the money supply, and the market would respond up or down. . . Now everything works on interest rates, the 30-year [U.S. Treasury] bond yield.’

 

"Fundamentals"
On the other hand, the "fundamentals," such as earnings, are typically ignored as evidenced in the tulip mania. The only apparent fundamentals that applied were the scarcity of the varieties and the beauty of their blooms. Professor Kindleberger points out that the "speculative climax occurred in the winter of 1636-37, when the bulbs had already been planted and wouldn't bloom until spring, and many investors had only vague descriptions to guide their bidding." Similarly, in the hunger for shares of South Sea Co. nearly a century later, "market participants overlooked that Spain, which claimed all of South America, had not signed off on the firm's supposed trade monopoly. A French banker named Martin, proffering his 500-pound investment, reasoned, ‘When the rest of the world are mad, we must imitate them in some fashion.’"

 

Unforeseen Event
A single unforeseen event can cause the bubble to burst. For example, the U.S. market crash of 1987 was caused in part, Kindleberger argued, by massive mutual fund redemption over the preceding weekend. One might associate a sell off by "insiders" as a potential reason, but he points out that it was ‘the peasants who sold.’

 

Short Memory
Professor Kindleberger ponders why markets don’t learn. His explanation is that ‘one generation learns, but then you get a lot of new guys. The question is, of the people in the market now--they don't remember 1929--but do they remember 1987? It's always the new boys who need to get a baptism of fire.’ The professor adds that "each successive group of speculators is able to persuade itself that its own situation is unique in history."

A more recent example might be the markets’ reaction to comments made on December 6 by U.S. Federal Reserve Chief Alan Greenspan that stocks and other asset markets might be facing "irrational exuberance." Markets did, however, recover the following business day from a more than four percent drop on December 5 in U.S. stocks after major European stock tumbling. Britain's FTSE 100 index closed down 88.2 points at 3,963. The German DAX index of top shares lost 117.95 points, closing at 2,791.96 points, the biggest loss since a nine percent tumble after the 1991 coup against former Soviet President Mikhail Gorbachev.

 

Sources: LA Times (January 2, 1997), CNNfn (December 6, 1996)  

 

By Alex Tajirian


[ Home of +Value | Bookstore | Instructors Corner | Finance Channel | About Us ]

 


LinkExchange
LinkExchange Member